FAITH & BELIEFS
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
Are faith and reason compatible?
  • Currently 1.4
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2

(7)
Big Thinker
Uploaded on 01/06/2008
In what ways can faith and reason coexist? Can they?
13
8
8
Responses
SORT BY
Re: Are faith and reason compatible?

Faith and reason coexist primarily as idealistic concepts that we misunderstand and misuse.

People who uphold reason as their motivator usually fail to see where their own unjustified assumptions lie. We've all got them, deep down (or not so deep).

People who are proud of their faith fail to acknowledge the real reasons they feel so comfortable taking actions without sufficient concrete evidence. (Childhood training, feeling of excitement, joy, or group acceptance...)

I see faith and reason as labels at each end of a scale.

3
0
Faith and Reason are mutually incompatible
 

Before any discussion of faith and reason can begin we need to define the parameters as both words have diverse meanings. I would assume that when we discuss the coexistence of Faith and Reason, that we are discussing the mutually exclusive definitions of the terms.

 

Most of the comments I have seen here on this topic seem to come from folks who embrace mumbo-jumbo and insist upon blending science with mumbo-jumbo. For example commenter roakes argues that 'Faith and Reason are interdependent,' as if the last 500 years of western history was not Reason struggling to break free from religion.

 

Yet, even as most commenters (as of this posting) seem to be of this persuasion, most of the voting indicates that the silent readers disagree. Faith and Reason are separate approaches to truth.

 

.............

--Reason is defined as Logic; the capacity for logical, rational, and analytic thought; intelligence. In Philosophy, reason is the faculty or power of acquiring intellectual knowledge, either by direct understanding of first principles or by argument.

 

Logic is the science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference. The study of the principles of reasoning, especially of the structure of propositions as distinguished from their content and of method and validity in deductive reasoning.

 

--Faith is defined as a set of beliefs not based on logical proof nor material evidence; a system of religious belief. Such as a confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of one's belief in God or in the doctrines or teachings of religion.

 

Not only is faith the body of dogma of a religion, but also the theological virtue defined as secure belief in God and a trusting acceptance of God's will.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

So reason is careful analysis to uncover truth, while faith is the acquiescence to belief without

evidence of truth. Faith assumes truth, while reason assumes that truth necessitates evidence.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Now to those who say that Faith can illuminate Reason, I point to our history of struggle with Reason being attacked by Faith. Any such argument must rationalize this reality. Reason can illuminate Faith, and I have posted such an example:

 

The Sun is our father in heaven.

http://www.bigthink.com/faith-beliefs/9020

 

But to those who argue that Reason alone is all we need, I refer you to John Ralston Saul, Canada's preeminent philosopher and spouse of Canada's former Governor General who has published much to criticize a purely Rational approach.

 

So, if Faith and Reason are indeed compatible within Saul's parameter's, I leave that to you to prove.

 

 

5
0
A rare occasion of faith, reason and compatibility with science:
 

A rare occasion of faith, reason and compatibility with science:

 

Our father, who art in heaven;
our mother, the earth:
we are your children...

 

In this twenty first century scientifically understood world we need a god that MEASURES OUR UNDERSTANDING rather than insulting our knowledge.

 

And in the 21'st century we don't need mumbo-jumbo; we need a faith that will spur us to escape these 'Progress Traps' (Ronald Wright) that we have created for ourselves: Energy Scarcity and Climate Change.

 

Neither Middle Age, Bronze Age nor New Age beliefs fit within these parameters.

 

First, be clear that my spiritual arguments are based upon our understanding of how the universe works. Of course our scientific knowledge is limited, but it is the only calculator we have with which to measure god.

 

This is our first great understanding: that all life's energy comes from the Sun. We are completely surrounded by the life-energy of the sun. The immense overwhelming mass of this blast furnace gives rise to life and sustains it. As this energy is necessary for life; can energy be life, or the wellspring of life? Cannot the Sun be seen as the father of this creation?

 

The Sun is our father in heaven and the earth is our mother. Life exists because of this relationship. The giver of life on this planet is the Sun, with the kind of life that exists here governed by this relationship.

 

The Sun is our father in heaven.

http://www.bigthink.com/faith-beliefs/9020

 

8
0
Re: Are faith and reason compatible?

Faith and reason have always been and are compatible, except for when "they" are trying to disprove each other.

There have been and are great scientific minds who have evolved ideas and concepts to benefit without finding a need to disavow spirituality/religious belief, in more cases it can be seen how such things support faith, though possibly not in the "assumed" or "expected" manner.

In turn, there have been and are faithful individuals who are truly humble and understand that we are simply human and incapable of fully knowing everything there is too know. And that faith, no more than reason can accomplish all of the answers desired.

Faith and reason compliment each other, when allowed too. In all honesty, faith and reason are human concepts of which we strive to know and will continue to change and evolve, just as they have throughout human history.

Connect-to-Value 2005-2008 ©

 

2
1
Re: Are faith and reason incompatible?

Description: Larry Summers on truth, debate, academia and George W. Bush.

Transcript:

We have an administration that takes pride in the fact that its policies are based on faith and conviction rather than reason and evidence. In a very different corner in large parts of the academic world – the parts of the academic world that would almost define themselves by the opposition to what the administration stands for – there’s a belief that truth is an arbitrary social construct, or a reflection . . . or a reflection of power relations rather than reality. And the great virtue of debate is respect for each other’s positions. And I have very much the opposite sense. The great virtue of debate is to understand it better, and you come closer to a better answer.

 

Recorded On: 6/13/07

2
0
Re: Are faith and reason incompatible?

Description: Mogahed's faith fuels her intellectual inquiry.

Transcript: Well I think that I wouldn’t even call it a balance, because a balance would imply a tradeoff between the two.  And I don’t think there is a tradeoff.  I think that my deeply held faith teaches me to intellectual inquiry.  It teaches integrity and honesty.  And I think that those are the core principles of good scientific inquiry.  So I have to be true to my discoveries and true to the rigor of the data, and report it exactly that way in order to be true to the values that I hold most dear.  And so I don’t think I ever feel it is a balance, but rather that one helps to assure the other; that they are co . . . that they strengthen one another; that religious principles should inspire scientists to do the best work they can.

Recorded on: 7/3/07

4
1
Re: Are faith and reason compatible?

Description: Faith and reason, Meacham says, are not incompatible.

Transcript: I don’t see faith and reason as being incompatible. John Paul the II once said, “They’re the two wings on which we rise on the contemplation of truth.” Very grand image. But the final leap of faith in monotheistic terms – to limit the conversation somewhat – is in fact irrational. As Henry. . . as Coleridge said, “It’s the willing suspension of disbelief.” So yeah, at the end of the day I make a leap into the irrational. But all the way up to that point, I think that my own particular religious faith is as well grounded in history and argument as anybody else’s, and sometimes perhaps more so than in other traditions. I like to think that the coherent element, if there is one – the common dominator – is a kind of hopefulness that whether one is intensely secular or intensely religious, one hopes for . . . presumably hopes for something better tomorrow than one has today. And how we get there is often what the fight is about. I have no interest in evangelizing. I have no interest in converting anyone to anything except one hopes a kind of matasonian appreciation of the fact that there are many conflicting forces all of which should be heard. And then we work out what we need to work out; but we have to do it with some sense that we’re doing it not simply for our appetites of the moment, but to make the world a better place in the sense that we will be more secure. We would be happier. We’re doing so for our children. And so I think hope is the linking . . . the linking factor because reason is not a particularly useful faculty if it’s not leading to something. And faith is not a particularly useful faculty if it doesn’t shape one’s behavior in ways that make one less likely to . . . As Thomas Jefferson once said, makes ones less likely to “pick someone’s pocket or break their arm.”

Recorded on: 7/3/07

 

 

0
0
Re: Are faith and reason incompatible?

Description: The Russian cosmonauts did not find God up there.

Transcript: I haven’t found any scientific advance that explains joy, or happiness, or genuine peace. Or that has achieved perfect satisfaction in mind, body or state. I haven’t found any scientific discovery that’s done that. There was the great cynical observation that when we started exploring outer space, that we might actually find where heaven was. And the Russian cosmonauts were supposed to report back as to whether God existed. Did they find him up there? And nobody did. Or medical science, when it _____ operating on the brain, or the very interior of the human body, could never quite find the soul. They keep looking and they never managed to do it. It seems to me that science could never explain such things as joy, or happiness, or sorrow, even though they try to find the little nodes in the brain in which these emotions are alleged to reside. And thus it seems to me science is able to describe certain realities, but it has it limits. And religion goes beyond those limits. That’s why they call it faith. That’s why it’s exciting. It seems much more exciting to me to be a pioneer on the frontiers of faith, than working out my salvation in some laboratory hoping that I’ll discover something in a jar of chemical unknowns. I think that’s very unlikely.

Recorded on: 6/12/07

 

 

17
3
PAGE
1