Bigthink - Idea Comments Feed

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Thu, 01 May 2008 23:30:18 +0100

well you lost...

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:26:06 +0100

The country has always been run by elites and since the onset of globalization (some would say hundreds of years ago) political leaders have had to take decisions based on things other than blind nationalism. In culture and society just as in biology there is always a drive for more complexity and more unity. The global economy has been in our future from the moment a pig was traded for a goat

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:27:18 +0100

According to a variety of sources, the following presidential candidates are either members of one of the groups or have strong ties: Hillary Rodham Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, John McCain, John Edwards, Fred Thompson, Joe Biden, Chris Dodd and Bill Richardson.

Mike Huckabee, though not a member, spoke to the CFR in September. Since then, his political star has risen to the point that he has become a top-tier candidate.

So often throughout recent history it has been the case.

Ever since Democrat Adlai Stevenson challenged Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956, the odds have significantly favored those with membership in the elite groups.

"David Rockefeller, whose family financed the CFR, is a common denominator among these parallel groups," writes Estulin. "Not only is he the CFR chairman emeritus, but he also continues to provide financial and personal support to the TC, CFR and Bilderberg Group."

What is the agenda behind these groups, which Estulin says are comprised of "self-interested elitists protecting their wealth and the investments of multinational banks and corporations in the growing world economy at the expense of developing nations and Third World countries"?

"The policies they develop," he writes, "benefit them as well as move us towards a one-world government."

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:19:57 +0100

Do you worship Blaphomet? You did visit with the CFR and they are the Owl Molehc worshiping crowd. Are you in a secret society YES OR NO?

I don't know how to spell it but you know what I mean. It is all there databased worldwide. You can not run, you can not hide the truth will follow you.

If you have an oath to someone else other than your country I don't even want to hear the double speak.....NEXT...

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:21:33 +0100

I agree with Mitt Romney's opinions on many issues and I do hope he will win. People are currently attempting to run the republicans out of office, mainly because of the war and economics. It is not right to assume that candidates from that party all have the same opinion on the war. I believe that voters should take the time to learn all the facts, and become more informed in their decision.

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:57:05 +0100

I don't see how Romney is very different from Bush. What we need is a president who will push us forward. We need a solid effort to rejuvenate our education system, which is now inferior to that of Europe and even some of Asia. We need someone who will undo the damage Bush has done to our relationship with the rest of the World. We need someone who understands the need to redefine America in the 21st century, rather than seek shelter in some romanticized illusion of the past. Nothing this guy's said suggests he has either the intelligence, nor the moral strength needed to lead America in that direction.

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:39 +0100

Man do I dislike Mr. Romney; he seems like a nice enough person but he seems as partisan as can be. He talks about George Bush having a strong record as a president, and is careful to not criticize his fellow republican for the war to much just saying it was mishandled, he refers to ideas he disagrees with as being "the left" first and then the idea. The man is as partisan as is possible and I do not like that. It should be what he thinks is right first, even if I do not agree with him I would prefer that he said what he thought not what the party thinks first.

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:54:13 +0100

I belive he has what it takes to win, many of the gentlemen in the Republican race have the right idea, they are men of integrity, My choice of President is Romney because I am a single mother.
This is a great Country, we need strong family values, we need to bring back the power of "The land of oportunity", The American flag still has heartfelt deep meaning to it, we need to bring back the same ideas of our four fathers had, back in our homes, back in our schools, our work place and etc. Romney lives those ideas he doesnt just preach them.

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:19:37 +0100

I hope my man Romney wins, he was awesome as my Governor, and looks promising as the new President of the great country.

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:31:48 +0100

What else would he have said?

Comment on: Re: If you don't win, will it have been worth it?

Bigthink — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:08:01 +0100

Did he pay to put this video on the web site? Any candidate plays to win. That is part of the problem with the political process. There is no compromise between the political parties.