http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Banner_686X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner_234X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250 http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo-Watermark_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner-ALT_234X60.jpg Bigthink - Idea Comments Feed Bigthink http://www.bigthink.com/feed/rss/comment/idea/2136 Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:48:44 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 Comment on: Re: Who are we? http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136 "HOPE WILL ALWAYS TAKE US FARTHER THAN FEAR"<br />Ernst Junger Bigthink Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:03:15 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136/#11354 Comment on: Re: Who are we? http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136 Well I semi-agree with Christi, that we cannot be fully judge on our collective past. But I do think it gives us a pretty good picture of who we are. Although I agree with the adapting part. It is truly ironic that although we are so advanced and have came so far, we have left out huge problems that trouble us today. Stubbornness is stupidness in a sort of way that to be not stupid, you cannot be stubborn. I think now we have grown so much that we can finally attack the most obvious principles that plague us today. Bigthink Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:13:06 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136/#7015 Comment on: Re: Who are we? http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136 I don't believe that who we have been historically, defines who we are essentially. <br /><br />As, the nature of life is much about adaptation, change, and constant evolution so it is the humans can continue to take in information from the environment and change and adapt and grow into new motives, ways of being, understanding, interacting, etc.. even collectively. <br /><br />Personally, I don't see our greater folly as "stupidity" as it is stubborness - being too stubborn to take in the facts, see more clearly, extend our understanding of "self-interest" and allow ourselves to change and respond - as I assert is more our true nature. Bigthink Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:57:28 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136/#4554 Comment on: Re: Who are we? http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136 Pertaining to the inability of people to make decisions based on sound probability, perhaps the good Professor should read "Gut Feelings, The Intelligence of the Unconscious" by Gerd Gigerenzer. Bigthink Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:19:45 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136/#4002 Comment on: Re: Who are we? http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136 Spot on. Dr. Ferguson is a smart man. Bigthink Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:56:19 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136/#853 Comment on: Re: Who are we? http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136 Stupidity defined as inefficient calculations of self-interest - it explains so much. This from an economist?! Bigthink Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:23:52 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136/#363 Comment on: Re: Who are we? http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136 I guess selfishness is a form of stupidity%u2026 and an evolutionary necessity. Bigthink Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:34:02 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136/#198 Comment on: Re: Who are we? http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136 I suppose greed leads to stupidity. Bigthink Tue, 08 Jan 2008 02:40:11 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136/#155 Comment on: Re: Who are we? http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136 A funny take on a complex issue. Bigthink Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:24:39 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/history/2136/#62