Bigthink - Idea Comments Feed

Comment on: Beauty versus Morality

Bigthink — Tue, 06 May 2008 04:38:35 +0100

Considering the predominantly postmodern thought process of our culture, there really isn't anything to base morality off of. If there is no absolute truth, than one view of morality really isn't any better than the other. And in that case, who's really to decide what is beauty? Beauty doesn't last, and who's the one that decides what is beauty and what isn't? Why the hell should I base my life on what somebody else says I should think is beautiful? What beauty on our country is based off of is stupid at best, and I really don't want any part of it.

Comment on: Beauty versus Morality

Bigthink — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:51:24 +0100

When in doubt I visit Nature, it takes many years of weekly visits to the forest before you realize that "Heaven" is the Natural World, while "Hell" is the Man-Made Artificial World.

But it does NOT have to be this way.

Please visit my post: "World Peace will be created by Architects"

Thank you :-)

Comment on: Beauty versus Morality

Bigthink — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:17:57 +0100

At the extremes of moral situations, such as liberating civilian death camps, or ones with little moment, such as the selection of lavender or mauve for house trim, whether to prefer the gorgeous or the right is unimportant. However, personal matters like mate selection demands addressing both: good potential parent or hot, hot loins?