http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Banner_686X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner_234X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250 http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo-Watermark_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner-ALT_234X60.jpg Bigthink http://www.bigthink.com/feed/rss/comment/idea/4507 Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:29:24 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.bigthink.com/life-death/4507 I would not either, at least the 50 year old did something with his life Bigthink Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:49:39 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/life-death/4507/#9680 http://www.bigthink.com/life-death/4507 No I would not. What I mean is that it is impossible to live a life with out risk. Hence if you live till your 80 youve taken more risks (and survived them) then a 23 year old.<br /><br />Also life is not only about survival. It's also about doing things that the human needs. Things like love, compassion, heroism and the like. Bigthink Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:53:28 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/life-death/4507/#2024