http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Banner_686X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner_234X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250 http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo-Watermark_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner-ALT_234X60.jpg Bigthink http://www.bigthink.com/feed/rss/comment/idea/5264 Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:46:24 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.bigthink.com/rest-diversions/bigthink-com/5264 Perhaps another route to determine "experts" would be to allow readers who have been impressed by statements submitted by certain big think users to recommend said usernames for consideration as "experts." Bigthink Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:43:36 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/rest-diversions/bigthink-com/5264/#4043 http://www.bigthink.com/rest-diversions/bigthink-com/5264 I guess the intent might be to start the ball rolling. Down the track, contributers with solid-ideas and logical-thoughts should float to the top as "experts". Bigthink Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:25:37 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/rest-diversions/bigthink-com/5264/#3263