http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Banner_686X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner_234X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250 http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo-Watermark_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner-ALT_234X60.jpg Bigthink - Idea Comments Feed Bigthink http://www.bigthink.com/feed/rss/comment/idea/6038 Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:02:16 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 Comment on: The Future of the Universe http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/6038 Karmanical -- you may be blurring the boundaries between physics and biology a bit [grin].<br /><br />If just one of the entities in our existence changed 'polarity', there would be readjustment of all else. One of the unavoidable-observations of Nature, is the wondrous ways in which all components interconnect in harmony and equilibrium. Bigthink Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:26:20 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/6038/#6863 Comment on: The Future of the Universe http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/6038 If matter did attract matter which it doesn't, matter that compressed to a point of resistance would eventually switch its polarity...thus begin to expand. similar to a breathing universe. Bigthink Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:17:44 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/6038/#6856 Comment on: The Future of the Universe http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/6038 Is not the universe expanding, and matter in afact geting farther appart? I think this is a confirms scientific fact acan anyone confirm this?<br /><br />But a very logical train of thought I AM. Bigthink Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:48:44 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/6038/#5897 Comment on: The Future of the Universe http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/6038 Oops. <br />Oh well. Just a thought. Bigthink Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:31:06 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/6038/#5797 Comment on: The Future of the Universe http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/6038 You start off with the false premise that "ALL matter attracts matter".<br /><br />There is a multitude of forces at work, resulting in equilibrium. If attraction was always the dominant-force, atoms would collapse, and then we'd be in a right pickle.<br /><br />If you accept the equivalence of mass and energy, there is no necessity to consider the amount of space that energy might require. Bigthink Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:49:02 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/6038/#5763