http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Banner_686X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner_234X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250 http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo-Watermark_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner-ALT_234X60.jpg Bigthink http://www.bigthink.com/feed/rss/comment/idea/8995 Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:34:28 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.bigthink.com/the-world/8995 The answer is yes. The National Supreme courts should be subordinate to International courts, just as they are in Europe. Bigthink Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:59:40 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/the-world/8995/#12169 http://www.bigthink.com/the-world/8995 Yes. I think National Supreme Courts of any country in matters of international law should <br />be subject to Internatioal COurts. This works very well in Europe where appeal can go beyond the natioanl supreme court to the European Court. Bigthink Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:56:17 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/the-world/8995/#12167 http://www.bigthink.com/the-world/8995 when you say international courts, do you mean courts that will out rank our supreme court in the same way our federal law out ranks the state law? Bigthink Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:10:08 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/the-world/8995/#12111