by johannine on Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:58 pm

one under god
Adept

Faroe Islands
863 Posts

It doesn’t matter what “charge”, indictment or complaint is brought against someone by a prosecutor; bureaucrats never have a case; their very nature dictates they can’t. While many would cry out in protest, no doubt those invested economically and/or emotionally in statism, it is nonetheless an accurate statement.

This is such a simple exercise; I only have to use statism against itself to prove it. By statism, I mean the belief “citizens” and “states” exist and the thought patterns supporting such beliefs.

Statism is mind control; people surrender their property to men and women pretending to be “governors” and “presidents” etc., because they believe they are “citizens” of a so-called “state” and “must pay their fair share.” Talk about abstract concepts.

Because of these beliefs, or programming, when a man pretending to be a “cop” or “state attorney” files a “complaint” against a statist, no attention is paid to the many absurdities present, even by the lawyer pretending he has a client, the so-called “state attorney.” The issue of standing is a great way of demonstrating these absurdities. One of these is despite the fact a “complaint” is filed, there is no “case” presented to the “court.” Statist programming equates “complaint” with “case.” People under the influence of such programming don’t challenge what a “cop” or “state” attorney files as both are perceived as“authority figures.” By that, I mean they do not challenge the assertion a “complaint” presents a “case” to a court.

Standing is legally defined as “The position of a person in reference to his capacity to act in a particular instance…19 Am J2d Corp § 559.” Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, page 1209. The nine lawyers commonly referred to as the “United States Supreme Court” have written: “In essence the question of standing is whether the litigant is entitled to have the court decide the merits of the dispute or of particular issues.” Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 (1975).

If a plaintiff lacks standing, then courts, all courts, are legally/constitutionally incapable of proceeding because: “courts only adjudicate justiciable controversies.” United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 337 US 426, 430. Notice the litigants in the last case if you’re thinking “government” is somehow “exempt” from standing requirements. People under the influence of statist mind control automatically start trying to find “loopholes” and exemptions for their “authority figures”, the government. This psychological response is not unlike the Stockholm syndrome.

And make no mistake, this is considered a very important issue by the “Supreme Court” and government attorneys, especially when they are the defendants as proven by the recent case the Bush administration lost in regards to the NSA spying program. Standing is usually a bureaucrat’s first line of defense. Pay attention to what the “Supreme Court” wrote about the elements of standing:

“The requirement of standing, however, has a core component derived directly from the Constitution. A plaintiff must allege personal injury fairly traceable to the defendant's allegedly unlawful conduct and likely to be redressed by the requested relief.” Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 751 (1984) (emphasis mine).

This of course references Article III § 2 of the “United States” “constitution” which requires a plaintiff to present a case before a court may proceed: “The judicial power shall extend to all cases…”:

“The case-or-controversy doctrines state fundamental limits on federal judicial power in our system of government. The Art. III doctrine that requires a litigant to have "standing" to invoke the power of a federal court is perhaps the most important of these doctrines.” Allen page 750.

More explicit, standing requires the violation of a legally (government) recognized right. The Declaration of Independence proves this: “That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men…” And from the Arizona “constitution”: “governments…are established to protect and maintain individual rights.” Article II § 2 (emphasis mine).

This means everything “governments” do must be to “protect and maintain individual rights.” The “Supreme Court” has held consistent with this principal: “the duty of this court, as of every judicial tribunal, is limited to determining rights of persons or of property, which are actually controverted Tyler v. Judges of the Court of Registration, 179 US 405

Standing consists of two absolutely essential elements: 1) violation of a legal right, and 2) personal injury. Now I’ll apply this standard to “cases” brought by pretended “state” and “United States” attorneys.

First, we’ll look at a traffic case, such as failure to wear a seatbelt. Traffic cases represent a significant source of energy stolen from people every year. I get a ticket for not wearing a seatbelt; the “case” is called State of Arizona v. Marc Stevens.

One of two requirements for standing is: “A plaintiff must allege personal injury…” Has the “State of Arizona” (a fiction) alleged I have caused a “personal injury” by not wearing a seatbelt? Of course not: that’s one essential element missing, I’ve already established the pretended plaintiff “is [not] entitled to have the court decide the merits of the dispute or of particular issues.” Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 (1975). Allegations or not, there is no injury to anyone if I don't wear a seatbelt.

The other requirement is the violation of a legal right. Has the “State of Arizona” (a fiction) alleged I violated the pretended “state’s” rights? Again, not a chance. According to the “Supreme Court,” there is no standing to complain against me regardless of the fact I may not have had a seatbelt on.

Now we’ll look at a “tax” case; “willful failure” to file a “tax return.” I have read several of these so-called “indictments” and there is no standing, ever. Even if you’ve never read such “indictment”, common sense tells you there are no allegations of personal injury and the violation of a legal right. No, all they do is write the defendant “violated the law.”

However, just being accused of “violating a law” does not mean my failure to file a “tax return” violated someone’s legal rights and caused an injury. Statists would argue the so-called “United States” has a legal right to receive a “tax return” from me every year and the injury is the loss of “tax revenue.” There are several problems with such a argument though.

First, the allegations are not in the indictment and that’s fatal. Second, it’s not “legally” sufficient to just make allegations, those allegations must be based on facts; those facts must establish where, when, why and how the legal right was allegedly acquired. And if facts are alleged, then they must be based on the testimony of witnesses with personal knowledge, Rule 602 Federal Rules of Evidence.

No attempt is made to put such allegations in an “indictment” because it’s impossible to establish factually how an obligation to file a “tax return” was created. To prove an obligation or legal right was created, there must be a connection between the people asserting the right and the person who allegedly has this obligation. Statists immediately point out the “constitution.” And that is the point where they lose; and lose big time.

No connection to the “constitution” can be made because the “constitution” is four pieces of paper no one bothered to sign. It binds no one and created nothing: same as any other pieces of paper from two hundred and thirty years ago. Unless you believe in magic, placing the words “constitution” on a piece of paper will not create an obligation on someone two hundred and thirty years later.

The “constitution” is a very effective anchor that usually pacifies those critical of statism. Most people will not challenge opinions the “constitution” is applicable or relevant; it’s one of the most sacred of cows. All “revenue agents” I have had experience with, like most people, assume the “constitution” applies to everyone. No thought is given to any facts to prove where, when, why and how the “constitution” applies to anyone. It is very unsettling for a “revenue agent” to be challenged on the facts his opinion the “constitution” is applicable are based because he/she has not based it on any facts. Nobody enjoys having their map of reality ripped apart.

A personal injury cannot be proven because it cannot be proven the “United States” had a right to the property in question or the “required” action. If you doubt this, then read cases such as Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935). It’s tantamount to Al Capone filing a complaint against a shop owner for not paying his “protection” money. Think big Al would have standing?
in the particular case before it.” (emphasis mine).

Last, let’s look at a drug case. I’m indicted for growing marijuana on my property. The botanical police raid my home and heroically save the world from my plants. Surprisingly, the requirements for standing are not the raiding of my garden by troops armed with machine guns, they are: 1) violation of a legal right, and 2) personal injury.

What legal right have I allegedly violated by growing plants? None. Has the growing of plants on my property caused any “personal injury” to the non-existent “State of Arizona”? Again, there’s no personal injury of any kind. No standing, no case.

Consider that legally, or “constitutionally,” the botanical warriors may not even look at my property unless there is “probable cause” or “reasonable articulable suspicion” I am violating someone’s legal rights: “governments…are established to protect and maintain individual rights.”

Notice in the cases cited above there are no “legal” or “constitutional” exceptions to the doctrine of standing for moral or religious objections. Just because someone thinks it’s “immoral” or against their religion to grow or possess marijuana, does not confer standing to complain. This is true even when the moral crusaders call themselves a “legislature.”

Now some may protest by bringing up the murder argument, certainly there is the 1) violation of a legal right, and 2) personal injury. Not even in a murder case is there standing to complain. Why? Because it has to be a “personal injury” to the plaintiff: “A plaintiff must allege personal injury fairly traceable to the defendant's allegedly unlawful conduct and likely to be redressed by the requested relief.” Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 751 (1984) (emphasis mine).

The plaintiff is literally a spoken and written phrase, an abstraction called the “State of Arizona”, and is, at best, a fictional third party. The “Supreme Court” has repeatedly held: “we have explained that prudential standing encompasses "the general prohibition on a litigant's raising another person's legal rights…” Elk Grove Unified School District et al. v. Newdow et al., 542 U.S. 1 (2004).

And there’s no merit to claim the murdered person is a part of, or a member of, the so-called “State of Arizona” because there is no such thing as the “State of Arizona.” As I’ve written in my book Adventures in Legal Land and said many times on my radio show The No State Project, there are no such things as “citizens” and “states”.

Ad hominem attacks such as “Marc doesn't want people to wear seatbelts” are classic diversion tactics employed by those under the influence of statist mind control (remember the Stockholm syndrome). The fact bureaucrats never have a case has nothing to do with my opinion about seatbelts (I personally use them because it’s a safety issue), it’s because governments are gangs of killers, thieves and liars. There is no such thing as a legitimate government, so nothing they do is legitimate regardless of the endless red herrings statists throw up.

Government is men and women providing services on a compulsory basis; pay or get shot. To be legitimate they would have to drop their guns and provide their services on a voluntary basis. However, the moment they do so, they cease to be a government. That’s quite the conundrum.

Either you believe all human interaction should be voluntary or you don’t. Those who do not believe human interaction should be voluntary are, medically speaking, anti-social. Not un-social, but anti-social as in "sociopath" and "psychopath". I believe all human interaction should be voluntary, so ad hominem attacks that I think people who commit murder should not be held accountable are ridiculous.

Just using statism against itself proves bureaucrats never have a case regardless of what they “charge” someone with. That’s because statism and it’s supporting theology are not here to promote freedom or protect “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness”; it’s mind control to divert our attention away from the actions of anti-social individuals who are so desperate to “protect” us they are willing to kill us and steal our property.



http://thinkfreebefree.proboards105.com/index.cgi

http://www.ericwhoru.com/

http://morgana.forumco.com/topic~TOPIC_ID~23132.asp

http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/1_god
http://www.youtube.com/1oneundergod1

my favourites list of todays favourited you tube clips[allways some new [neo] revelation,
revealing the vision behind the s/words
http://www.youtube.com/profile_favorites?user=oneundergod

note previously

http://www.youtube.com/profile_favorites?user=1oneundergod1
http://swedenborg.newearth.org/hh/hh00toc.html
http://www.angelfire.com/ne/newviews/heavenearth.html
http://www.angelfire.com/ne/newviews/life.html
http://www.angelfire.com/ne/newviews/facts.html
http://www.angelfire.com/ne/newviews/morelife.html
http://www.angelfire.com/ne/newviews/hereafter.html
http://www.angelfire.com/ne/newviews/morelight.html

govt is formed by free people
to controle 'city-zens'

people are born free [natural] who as being freeborn are free to create supernatural instruments [con-statut-[ed] ;constituted to bond free men into slaves ;citisens ,based on legal fictions ,via statutory instruments [birth certificates ,licences ] formed under non natural instruments of control called countries

god made the land ,man divided gods land into ''count-tries'' ,constituted to enslave freemen into'' civil-alians'' ,designed as the means to enslave freemen into bonded slaves ,civilian is a political status
that determines us under an artificial con-struct' ''juris-restiction'' ; juristiction that obligates 'citizens' into becoming bonded into a living  collateral  ,by doing things like pay taxes , pay levies , pay licence fees , accept restrictions over our god given inherant freedoms ,its all based on our number ;all based on out certificates of birth

we are born as babies ,thus can only [at best] 'know' as true [by our living now ], to have been definativly born ,but as to ''knowing''the complets ; absolute truth that we were born in a country, on a given day to a true parentage is not a thing 'we ' can swear to know to be 100 percent true , we accept this on trust ,its not what we know to be true, we can trust its true ,but not kbnow [for god given surity] that all of it is 100 percent true

we need to be sure before we take oath [read matthew 5;33-37 ,matthew 23;16-23] ,that we are told [or presume to be true , may not be true ,because we were babies we thus dont [cant] know its true

our birth certificate is produced by an un-natural agency ; god didnt 'create' govt , men did ,that god did create is good [the land ,;life on the land etc ,our freedoms are being suppressed by those who have seized control of govt ,who via un-natural instruments [birth certificates , licences, permites, taxes , levies, duties,''mutual obligations'' ,that the freeborn people need to obey , but not the elites,

 who have put thier power [money , property ,assets , safly under other instruments [like family trusts] , who via thier 'trusts 'have escaped the paying of taxes etc to put all the burdon on us , those god creatred as free men , sons of sovereigns ;suns of god  [all of us ]

im on the outer as far as child labour goes ,charity is fine but it also dosnt work ,our children are getting used to getting everything for free ,employers are noting the work ethic isnt in this new generation ,who just want to be amused because they are bored, fed because they are hungry ,its fine to give charity ,indeed one of the highest acts the wealthy can give ,as your article notes feeding the hungry ,housing the poor is that which honours our creation

know i have no dispute with the need [indeed urgency of the wealthy doing that good and true ,like the writer i see no need to deprive the elite of thier wealth , detesting as he does those who steal [stole] it , especially those who stole the millions ,but my reply is more about the children ,in getting them to appriciate that they have rather than what they dont

the age is long past where we can send them onto the land ,i put the solution where i see the problem , edication[either from thier parents, the media, thier peers ,or schools ,we need to controle but two [media and education] media can give good egsamples [the leave it to beaver type work ethic ,and politness , rather than the bart simpson ,dennis the menis in media

and in education a work house [oh i hear the screams all ready ,but having raised children i know children love creating things [work] ,we are all indued by our creator with inherant talents [i have a link some where but a cut and paste of it is at morgana forumco site]under the law tort article referanced in an earlier post
http://morgana.forumco.com/topic~TOPIC_ID~23125.asp
see talents post/paste

regardless education need to educate the talented and the imbisile equally, with the retards holding the whole back by thier being needy and destractive ,many dont need teachers they need [deserve ] wardens but we are talking about future humans ,

many who will never need to know where usa is let alone need to know trig or algebra ,these special darlings need to learn the work ethic ,need to know the rewards inherant in sweat growing up knowing work with your head or your hands

if your not learning learn what work suits you best ,test the little dears ,find thier real talents ,while many will want to become musitions , only talent will get you into that class ,you have the smart class ,and the working class ,the working class will find thier work a better pleasure than the learning of that boring class work

each will top out at a certain level of achievment, but thier schooling dosnt end untill they have a real job ,real paid income ,new teachings are initiated [in and outside school[like the old bob a job, or like apprentaships ,of course this is in no way clear , we must learn to think outside the box, the media rewards the great minds with media exposure equal to that accorded to sports people

the future lies in using our resources wisely ,our best resource is our children, who must know they are respected and protected but also obligated ,as well as needed

ok im done

[the right to free speech and unhindered free-act  ,the right to life [being born free] the right to free act as a birth right [if of good intent] ..the right to despise death, and those seeking to cause it [the way as well as the means [war ,guns, oppression,, and the media that perpetuates it before our eyes daily]

stead fast belief in a living loving grace filled ;mercyfull creator ,..a omni-living devine creator who sustains all life to live..so that that life find that it loves [accepts] and that it despises and [of freewill] rejects

a believe [or the right to deney] the true one of light /love ,mercy and life creator god] ..who bequeaths upon all life [to live ] as a devine god given right...as enshined by mens freewill [not oppressive law , pr spin or deceits

the one omnipresent omnipotant god gives all life inherant free chosen belief as well as the means to confirm [or deney ] all aspects of life and this incarnate experiance of 'living [as a freeborn man ,in our inherant devine right to think and act like a freeman...

to think act and reason of love not paternalistic oppression ,...allowed to resist oppression by passive resistance to any personalised or systemised oppression , that seeks to subversivly suppress free [non injurous] personal act

i am [because ''I AM made me ]one who believes all life is sacred [because of 'his' devine spirit in our all our hearts ...the one life sprit that sanctifies and activates all living spirit...
[animates all good [all truth] all love in serving unto all ,

allowed [indeed born ] to enjoy or enjoin any good true fair equal and mercy full ,as a right that comes from his omnipresent omnipotance [to live time all the time] in his god given 'real time ' now' ,and forever according to my own conciouys , rights and reason [my logic not paternalistic oppressive ,subversive war based oppressive logic [con-census] or by act made law by demon-autocratic [democratic con-census] a subversion colluded to controle

 seeking to control my feedoms as a freeman into a 'person'' bonded from birth to a law based not on god but the laws of comerce , to resist might is right , by free act and free thought

 [sweet awakrenings little ones ]

 Earth = a place that can be seen as being like in a holo-deck , especially when we detatch from our physical containment [our bodilly form as in our dreams(as seen in the star treck series); it is only in our dreams that the full fantasy of a tv fanticy can take any resembeling its ultimate form which in later realities is being 'played' in like virtual reality concepts only inaginable while we in this flesh form

 concieved so differently by many , life is yet is available to all ,in the after life , anything we imagine can be made  to take shape , it is able to be formed from simple words,or rather the vibratory emotion in the words , then able to be sang into its ultimate form ,

a temporal form [of epiritual essence that is able to be sustained as long as it has others appriciating its being

noting that a bad form cannot egsist in a good place ,nor a good thing in a bad place [hell]

but not sure many younger people could relate with star trec?any more [many didnt get it when it was real time ,let alone its archic meaning even then, while trying to present a future vision[and those who did get it were ridiculed into,obscurity ,simply labeled as treckies ,then ridiculed into a historic visual obscure void

it (can be compared to 'second life' but life is even more complex than even a wen based realuity can concieve and the many playing at it the same time with different motives and with diferent strategies are in no way comparable to this living life [the real time we are living , this living now of constant time

of chance and oppertuinity living in lifes realities as onlt living [incarnate living] provides [enables]). to be honest its a pale comparison ,but it [the 2 de life ,isnt a thing that can clarify peoples understandings of the what and why we are here , it isnt like any thing except a pale advance idea of what is to come,

to enable us all to form a basic compliment of loves we would love to be doing for eternity to come , living in the ever now even as now as when now was then, the place of the eternal living life , [mind] being all that we can be is  revealing ever yet more of what the light [living loving light ;life [god]really is ]

 i havnt 'played it [2 de life],and relitivly few have ,the ones who would understand are possably allready living thier version of it on the web ,i admit the concieving it is in the doing of it because you love it seems closer to this incarnate rreality [bound with money/time to be doing it , ecept in the game good and evil coegsist,

in heaven only good can egsist , also in hell only evil , both wefts and weaves of the complete tapestry of god as we the weaves bind with its parrelels and oppisites within its deciectfull love of its evil, as reflected in our own inherant frewill ,our choice betewen good and evil

the after being is more like a place of loves , one loving to serve the good, the other loving to serve thier evils both oppiste sides of the same coin It has strict rules to be follwed but can we say life is the same ,i hazard to say not ,'

life' is so simple a dumb plant can do it, or an animal (but i agree life gives gives enough room for every one , everything to have its own identoty and its own ideas and it also allows us to experiment , and play with concepts according as we chose).

life allows us to each chose [relitivelly freely]our future realities , except we have these evil 'dogooders, seeking to make people love good [little knowing they are really getting ready to go to the place those controllers go [to the -place of controllers, [to them its heaven [to me its hell, but the same can be said about all in the heavens as well as the all in hell ,

, either stuck in the other place would feel condemed to hell, but yet each feels like they are in heaven, because in this life they learned to love somethjing, anything ,we here to get what we love to be doing after we leave here but i have drifted away from your 'story '

[notes?]

 History = different parts of that 'game' but knowing everything is noted as /why . or because it happened [here not there ] there you need to make your own reality [find that you know you wish to do,

if you dont care you come back here till you find something to care [love ] something you love to be doing , till you chose something else ,foever, unless you get disinterested [then you get smaller and smaller till one day you return here [or else where as a crawl in

past life(s) = different roles you had in that 'game' [different steps in the evolution of your spirit, [stages of advancement ] evils we can rewrite by 'doing ' life again, our karma , being high born low born we chose as spirits [to whom much is given much is expected

Reasons for it [life] = 1. entertainment [learning what we love to do] balance our karma havibng a second [new start.

2. trying out new ways of doing things [trying to find our own progression through eternity ] in learning to love to do everything

3. [self] testing, 4 if you understood the 'lessons' , you seek out the next stage , there is all ways a next stage 5(given outside that 'holo-deck') in a 'virtual' way before doing them in 'real' thats what life is

[this is the practice , childhood before we morph into spirit People = most just there to make it more 'real';[people all here to learn to love , to get us to the next step [of spiritual progression one time the victim, then the oppressor [or rather visa versa, the victimes here were mostly the oppressors before as you give so willm it be given, to the last tear

some feel this is all for them;thinking its all about me [there is no me but god] the only me [invert me =we that us gods reflection, the logic from the logos, the knowledge off the knower some ALL are the ones that it was 'made' for (see reasons);

some think they are are 'supervisors / controlers of the 'game' being there directly to intervene if rules are broken ,yet thier next progression is to become controlled when they join the other controllers in heaven [or in hell] depends on what the master controller wants to control you to become

[todo] 2012 = end of the 'virtual' testing phase and When an upgrade of the 'game' enters a higher level , as people awake to the living balance in all life, working to help each spirit evoiolve to its highest inevitable incarnation , realising [again [] its true purpose heaven schooling on earth evil accends to a new --> new 'virtual' testing place as all possibilities have been tried out

[ok yeah once bitten twice shy]

one annonimouse complaint saw my freespeech [and 5000 posts censured at yahoo[answers community][one years worth of ideas stolen] so yes there is an underlying reason behind these thoughts]

reporting abuse [is the grey button extreem right in line with the base] [so many things are unique here at think big]

 i think most of us know abuse when we see it using the reporting button shouldnt be able to be abused [and posters and simply readers ] should have equal empowerment in using it

it [the reporting of abuse]is a remidy of what is percieved as bias , or threat, or insult ,clearly in pushing it some real event or incident is being reported ,unfortunayly this isnt allways the case

there is in this word [unfortuinatly] serial complainers who for thier own reasoning or fear seek to use the system to supress others speach ,by using thier own motivations to systematiclly abuse others

many use other id's, work in groups ,and serve special intrest groups ,it would be hoped that these persons not control the development of big idea via thier fears , any complaint should see both parties being consulted as well as a reviewal of thier variable postings

any complained againt should be allowed to prove thier honest bonifidies by being allowed to prove [via links or adresses thier previous postings her or at other sites] or other referances they feel may help get to the reality of the real problem

if real offense is proved certain banning should result perhaps by flagging thier name /postings under the title of serial abuser [or serial complainer however the case may be ]
the complaint must be fullsone ,and remain attatched with the offending post ,in complaining no idea can be subverted or stolen or suppressed [only flaged and tagged ] the whole idea and the results become part of the whole big idea, others being allowed to judge for them selves the verasity of both sides

annonimouse complaints [where auto censure is enforced , is a violation of everyones freec speech ,]
if you protest [as we all must ,if we see wrong and dont feel secure in trying to fix it this inherantly is via missunderstanding or previous abuses
 it must be by both parties knowing it is part of the expansion of the origonal idea] that both will balance each other out
either way posting and complaint will remain linked [and posted],

but a copy of them [complained for /against , will be installed in its special containment page ,complaint pages

, so others may further expand [defend ] each point, and see the real abuse and the systemised abuses revealed on other sites not become the norm here

free speech isnt free , but censure of peoples ideas cannot be hidden or subverted but will be in fullness and fairness to both pareties be contained here

moderators comments form and shape the further development of all ideas ,but of course thier discretion and supreem right is the final arvetration

people knowing thier ideas cant ever be suypressed [only correected]will hopefully ensure honesty is able to be ensured to the greater higher good our enjoined true freespeech [a true big idea] enshrines

is the pen mightier than the sword?

not really micha
words are sacred
they have power beyond belief
think of the words [s/words]
in that the pen is mightier than sword

amelek appears to be just another word
even a nonsense or dead word ,unless we are able to understand what it means to those using the word as thier mother toungue

take the word gay [as an every day egsample]
im happy and gay [but my wife knows im not at all 'gay'in the least]
its funny looking back at that[her given names are jeanette gay]
but i know she isnt 'gay' either

but if some old person says they are feeling gay [we know they possably arnt 'really' gay either

but that is too obvious a word ,learn what a semite is
before you [figerativly speaking]can call anti-semitism
a semite is an arab ,what israel is doing to the palestrinians is true anti-semitism ,[yet the word has much power in its now common missrepresented meaning ] many could presume wrongly its what arabs do to israel]

its all how the words are presented [like your snow poem] like caters mother ,like the much vaunted and awaited 'messiah' is believed by the jewish people [the people of israel] to be the one who helps them overcome thier mortal enimies the palistuinians
[thats how they [and jesus knew he wasnt the long awaited messiah]

sharon [may peace be upon him [yet lying in his coma [for all we know]was close to being that messiah [but even him the loyalist [when he tried to make real peace with palistein ,was revealed to his own to have feet of clay]

he didnt fit what they [his own people] [whom he served as a true leader does [to bring peace to our homeland] thought [his own who think to know historiclly the true messiah to be a fighter, they [gods own favoured people ]dont under stand what a true s/word is even today [just as we failed forewver to 'get ' the true living , loving creator god

father of life [not death], god of this ever 'new'= [neo] now the know of this ever now living moment, not any god captured in book and ritual slaughter,

the [our ,y/our]living father , all living loving grace and most mercyfull eternal father of all the living[as our brother [the true son of all men [the christ spirit] revealed [when even then god the father of all life was living then in the even then living 'now [know]our beloved jesus ;who revealed the god [holy spirit] living within all living

but im drifted off topic, our amercican brothers and sisters have the biggest decision of our fathers creation to make ,armogeddon is within reach, the true [stan] of israel is to be unleashed from his pit permabnently [returning all living to return to dust] to install the father of life back into his [supposed rightfull place [in heaven] ,what use the life giver being this devided ,

there are those [dead spirits off the jinn] who serve mens freewill to subvert freewill
who seek to return god [our enjoined life;living spirit] back as one [undivided ] on his throne ,they just need to kill all living , all life [to return the clay of scull and bones back to dust]

[thinking only then that god the one [sustaining our very lives [all living]] to becomes one ]...[so unless we can come together as one to preserve this [his]infinatly divided [emmanuel=[god with us ] , by voting right [despite the seemingly limited choice]... 9if only aqmericans could know how important[not impotant] thier voteing choice is
but such is freewill
we can believe as we will
vote as we chose
chose to believe everything is nothing
that black is white
might is right
or right is wrong
it all begins [ends] with knowing the real ,intended ,realisable ,hidden, implied , inherant ,historic, purposed, true meaning hidden in the word [in every word]
but they will get it in time

vote you first world citizens
get involved
the primaries are not the end
how about a unity ticket
a war cabinet
but you dont get what those words mean
you hear peace [but see pieces]
[not you micha , the generic 'u']of u 'all]
vote'r darn it
enter into entente

[either they like the question's reply or they reject the answer , either way where before there was only an unknown [ie a question]they now have something that by adopting or rejecting yet gives them an idea to go and read someones ideas [here]

do not be suprised to find only questions ,that are rightfully only questions searching for your idea yet in replying you arnt credited with giving them an reply [ie an idea]but they are for asking the question you will notice many people repeating the same question [sorry i mean idea]

 but no one has any idea what to reply to the multiple questioners [sorry ideas] so what i have found is to double post my ideas ,so i can keep track of my own ideas, rather than them just disappeareing into the mass of unanswered questions [sorry idea's]

 i will now post this idea [sorry reply] that thankfully has allready evolved into a more simple method pushing send sends the screen grey,

 i log in [despite comming in through my one under god page and my idea [sorry answer] goes into this poster file but i learned after losing 6 other ideas [sorry answers to others questions to cut and paste my idea [sorry answer as my own idea at my own page ]

no doudt when people get more of an idea they will build a collection of thier own ideas [sorry answers] but im getting a head ache now so i will go through the process , and rest till others get more ideas [sorry questions]

 still its something to do [even if by reply i just get lost , because im the one with no idea wish me luck all the best try to save your own replies as your own ideas [it seems strange but it works]

media is supposed to be dispassionate when reporting facts ,it is allowed passion with sport and the arts ,noting neither sport nor the arts are news

you sir richard are an ideal case in point, while your flair and passion are motivated by your buisness ,thier promotion as news isnt what news is supposed to be

neither is the reportage of road deaths , sports scores or what the rich and famous may or may not be doing today ,but none of that is going to change [is it]so who can blame you for using it to the max,

its past time that we see you doing something 'new' any way, but it shouldnt be classed as new[s] but light entertainment

news is in a terrible state, the same headlines , and opinion masking as news every 15 minutes or so ,news shouldnt really be in depth ,[thats why we go to news papers for ,or more reasonably web sites, using active links]

in a fast paced news reportage two or three minutes could cover the headlines intersperced with real news ,then arts , national news then sports, political news , then health ,international news ,then personnality , news ,then buisness , news then stock reports, news then science ,then news , weather

possably with a ticker tape running under with hot links hooked up to the digital ,that searches for more detail ,watchable during the slow times , or able to run together in a weekly progressive  sumerised sequence

what is anoying is not know in how something happened , or why , or how it turned out ,computers can accumulate the whole progression to run at our conveniance

i am discusted in our present media,bbc has the same as cnn, fox is so clearly biased as to be insulting to non war mongering peace nicks such as myself

i pray some saviour [virgen to the media starts a site like this , or my space or answers that does the whole news in a truely un biased manner
but it aint going to happen now is it 

featurs a four corners report from last year
about the us meltdown [ok it wasnt prophecy but what prophecy say about it?]
i know its only about money but people losing thier assets aint that a big one?

so tell me who coulda [or did]thunk it
so tell me who saw it [if any] comming [when]

so tell me how it ends oh mighty visionaries
did nostril damm us predict it in any quartrain

i know i shouldnt pick on dead poets but what the worth of these futures speculators when thier speculations can be so wrong[^]

we got vice presidements [and lazy presedents] making armogeddon plans on future prophecy [can wqe at least get proof the subject [prophecy] is any real use?

in the case of drug prohibition this is based on lies , deeming a plant a drug is a pure lie [in the case of cannabis [wrongly called marijuanna] ,drugs are a medical issue [govt involvment should be only at the level of ensuring purity [non contamination of its particular parts]

 in light of only god making a seed to grow the issue becomes more peverted , that people be given serious prison time for cultivating a plant is the height of paternalistic fear gone insane ,it is not a coincidence the first free act of the children of adam and eve involved a plant ,[legally a fixture] and a fungable , that god found the fat [increase] of the fungable [the lamb the act of a good sheppard ] and mere dead seeds from a fixture [he did not make grow] is further highlighted in the tale of jonah

that god gave us EVERY seed bearing plant ''for food ' gen 2;29 further highlights the absurdity of prohibiting a [any plant] [noting rev 22 that the tree of life highlights and confirms the other teachings [that the leaves be for the healing of the nations ]

 it will come as no suprise that of issiah ''smoking flax he refused to quence,'' or the story of the bush that was not consumed of exodus ,the clarity is revealed in the very words when jesus spoke ''set the prisoners free''

that the law was delivered by a burning bush should also be noted , [add to those facts that hemp [cannabis /marijuana [a trade mark owned by bayer corp [the same bayer that made the gas that jilled the jews ww2 ,the colusions of dupont brothers [inventing nylon, [hemp replaqcement] the acts of hurst and anslinger with thier lies and deceits ,plus the ongoing legal complicities of law enforcements agencies and lawyers , the true collusion and complicities become clear

that higher diservice to humans can not be concieved , beyond that of cannabis [hemp] prohibition [a primary multiple cropping source of fibre /feul, paper , food /plastic  and over 30,000 other sustainable and usfull products and medicines [invcliuding cancer cures, arthritus pain preventions, stroke medication [in itself a billion dollar industry] ,

the colluded deceits of prohibition are clearly a crime against sustainable humabnity[just with paper production planting one quater the land clearfelled [last year alone ] would meet all mans paper needs for eternity, plus reap its reward of seeds for food [bio feuls] and hundreds of industrial supplies each month[as per revc 22;2] noting cotton [a fibre crop uses over one half of the worlds supply of pesticide and fertilisers alone [not to mention round up ]