http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Banner_686X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner_234X60.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo_250X250 http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Logo-Watermark_250X250.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Background_1024X576.jpg http://www.bigthink.com/adobe/Half-Banner-ALT_234X60.jpg Bigthink - User Ideas Feed Bigthink http://www.bigthink.com/feed/rss/user/8752 Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:54:47 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 Re: Time is Not Real. It Is a Human Perception. http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/7568 Time is real and would exist whether life on Earth existed or not, since change has been around since the Universe began. If the Universe has always existed, then so has change and therefore, time.

Why life exists could just be that life is inevitable given the proper mix of organic molecules, warm enough temperatures, energy and time. Life has more than likely taken hold on planets and/or moons of other stars, just as it has here. There are so many planets being discovered beyond our star system, that they are the norm, rather than the exception. I feel that life, too, will be found to be common, as well. As for intelligence, one could question whether the average of all human's minds would be considered "intelligent" on an advanced, more civilized alien's wisdom scale.

Life is a happy consequence or accident. Time is just how change is measured. For planets to form without life around newly ignited stars will require time/change, whether life is ever there or not, for motion and orbits and gravity to do their evolving work.

And yes, if a tree falls in the woods, and no one is there to hear it, it does, still make a sound. Nature does NOT need humans to exist and change, period. 

]]>
Bigthink Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:36:34 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/7568
Who else has has there responses on Big Think removed??CENSORSHIP? http://www.bigthink.com/truth-justice/7379 Bigthink Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:36:28 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/truth-justice/7379 Re: Will mankind ever figure out a way to travel back in time? http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/7092 Maybe. If we don't allow the fools in our midst to bring us all to the brink of extinction.  But, as for Time Travel into the Past, I think it has been agreed upon by any scientists who even talk about it as possible, that you wouldn't be able to go back to a time before your machine became operational. If this is the harsh reality, then time travel may only be a way to escape from disaster on a planet-wide scale into a past before said disasters. Which, of course, would still be quite useful, but as a research tool into the past, not so much.

I really like watching Doctor Who, especially the newest ones from 2005 on. Most are masterpieces in their own right, for emotionally involving the viewers, not just fascinating them with gee-whiz special FX and sci-fi gadgetry. The stories are very engaging, even if they are very British centered. But the Tardis is very ancient indeed, according to Doctor Who lore, so old as to go back to before the Earth itself formed and not violating the above rules.

But, fantasy is fantasy. Best we can hope for right now, tho. I'm sure most of us would agree, mankind has NOT matured enough to be responsible with anything as powerful as Time Travel, anyway. 

]]>
Bigthink Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:10:22 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/7092
Cosmic Expansion, Big Bang and Red Shift Question. http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/7022 Have any pictures of galaxies or clusters of galaxies taken many years apart shown these receding objects actually getting smaller? I hope this isn't a stupid question, as the size of these objects is immense and so are the distances involved. I guess my question is meant as a means of evidence in support of Luminal Red Shifts which are supposed to tell how fast objects are moving away from us due to cosmic expansion from the Big Bang. Just as another way to convince everyone who may still be on the fence, like the Null Physics camp. I suppose I could research this myself with the web, but I was hoping to drum up some discussion.

Those who would discount Big Bang Theory with Static Universe, or (a cosmos that stays the same forever), would latch onto any weakness in accepted theories, so I was just curious if this kind of comparision is even possible given the 150 years or so since photography was invented. 

]]>
Bigthink Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:26:47 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/7022
Re: Re: What are the risks of centralizing information? http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/the-internet/6426 Bigthink Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:06:38 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/the-internet/6426 Re: Re: Whom you would you like to see interviewed on bigthink? http://www.bigthink.com/rest-diversions/6315 Dr. Ron Paul. He is running for President, is against NAFTA and the Superhighway that would erase American Sovereignty and would pull us out of Iraq sooner than any other candidate.

Despite all this, he gets almost zero media attention. Why is this???? Because of his chances?

He is also from Texas, I believe, but so are a lot of decent people. The North American Union is a bad idea, right now, for a multitude of reasons. It seems the Bushies want all of us to just give away our heritage to the highest bidders. Ron Paul would stop them. Give him another voice, please! 

]]>
Bigthink Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:41:01 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/rest-diversions/6315
Re: Re: Should there be a North American Union? http://www.bigthink.com/policy-politics/2008-elections/6314 No, but for differnet reasons. Bush and his handlers are trying to outmanuever Congress into getting the NAFTA Superhighway built and our borders erased. Never mind the immigration distraction Bush was fumbling around about. Dr. Ron Paul is on to this scheme and wants to end it before it gets unstoppable, but the media refuses to give him any "real" attention. Perhaps the Bush "thugs" have gotten to them all, but whatever. It pumps millions of dollars into Bush's friends interests to build the massive project. Taxpayer money has already been used for feasability studies, despite zero approval from Congress, which is Constitutionally necessary, but we're talking "the Dick & George Show" here, remember. They're above the Law, ask Nanci Pelosi, who refuses to initiate any impeachment proceedings, but everyone who wants to be informed already knows all that.

We're talking about many more jobs going outside our borders and more of our GNP going to other countries, as well. Canada & Mexico probably have been told this will all be good for them, but look who's telling them that. Biggest set of LIARS we've ever been led by.

It's strictly for profit and control, again, nothing more altruistic (when is it ever?) than that.

Greed, power, greed, money, control . Neo-conservative, fascism at its finest. Let's all do nothing and watch, shall we???? Come on, you sheep, wake up!!! and stop being led around by the nose & stop trusting the current puppet masters. The livelyhoods you help to save could be your own.....

]]>
Bigthink Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:32:18 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/policy-politics/2008-elections/6314
Could Bush & Cheney be tried for war crimes by an international court?Executed? http://www.bigthink.com/truth-justice/5975 Bigthink Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:16:13 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/truth-justice/5975 Re: What powers magnetism, subatomic particles, and gravity? Science, please. http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/4677 I'm sorry, but potential energy is missing my point. What makes Gravity attract mass to itself?

I took physics and chemistry and algebra and took some tech school electronics & engineering in the early 80's. Kinetic & potential energies are easy concepts for me to grasp, but why does mass attract itself. Einstein describes what happens and his theories are so far correct in our current understanding of physics and he makes an attempt at WHY that is really just a description of what will always happen. Warping of space-time by mass is really a very weird concept that could explain what is happening with planetary orbits and the sun's (or any star) gravimetric pull. It describes exactly what will happen for planning spacecraft probes tragectories. This is not an explanation of the why, however. Why does matter attract itself like a "tractor beam" if you will?

this is a BIG PICTURE type question, not some high school physics question you can look up the answer to in ANY textbook. I feel if we could really understand WHY gravity does what it does, we could have a much easier time traveling in space and perhaps improve life here, too. Describing what nature does is easy, why it does it is much harder. Thank you for all your responses. Keep them coming if you think you GET my questions. I am 47 and a man, by the way. 

]]>
Bigthink Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:03:00 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/4677
What powers magnetism, subatomic particles, and gravity? Science, please. http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/4214 Bigthink Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:23:06 +0100 http://www.bigthink.com/science-technology/space-time/4214