<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Big Think Forums Topic: I think we have a problem Houston...</title>
<link>http://www.bigthink.com/forums/</link>
<description>Big Think Forums Topic: I think we have a problem Houston...</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:46:14 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>2 on "I think we have a problem Houston..."</title>
<link>http://www.bigthink.com/forums/topic/64#post-377</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>2</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">377@http://www.bigthink.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Thanks for keeping us alert Cosmos! Always useful to get this feedback...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>3949 on "I think we have a problem Houston..."</title>
<link>http://www.bigthink.com/forums/topic/64#post-354</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>3949</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">354@http://www.bigthink.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;BigThink -- The problem has disappeared, and there are now a much more respectable &#34;4&#34; Responses.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Note that this was more than just a bad number displayed -- when clicked, it tried to open non-existent links until the Browser locked up.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Just one of those one-off glitches, I guess [grin].
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>2 on "I think we have a problem Houston..."</title>
<link>http://www.bigthink.com/forums/topic/64#post-351</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>2</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">351@http://www.bigthink.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Cosmos,&#60;br /&#62;
We followed your link but did not see the problem regarding the huge number of responses you reported. We will keep an eye on this in the future and certainly alert us at &#60;a href=&#34;mailto:suggestions@bigthink.com.&#34;&#62;suggestions@bigthink.com.&#60;/a&#62; Thanks for taking the time to alert us any problems with the site. Your feedback is invaluable.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Big Thinker
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>3949 on "I think we have a problem Houston..."</title>
<link>http://www.bigthink.com/forums/topic/64#post-348</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>3949</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">348@http://www.bigthink.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;BigThink -- this problem is quite serious I would have thought.  It still exists.  Check -- &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.bigthink.com/outlook-the-future/1049&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.bigthink.com/outlook-the-future/1049&#60;/a&#62;  under &#34;Featured In...&#34;, and you should see that there are 4,294,967,295 Responses listed.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Did I make my original problem report too cryptic?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>3949 on "I think we have a problem Houston..."</title>
<link>http://www.bigthink.com/forums/topic/64#post-332</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>3949</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">332@http://www.bigthink.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Wow... a Response to die for.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;After a recent response to &#34;How will this age be remembered?&#34;, I noticed that there were 4,294,967,294 other responses. You should impose a limit here -- 10,000,000 might be sufficient.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;And I thought &#34;God&#34; was the hot topic. [grin]
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
