When, after thirty years of authoritarian rule, a young dissident
and perennial thorn in the side of the Establishment, Mohammed Nasheed
won the first free and fair election in the Maldives in 2008, much of
the World applauded. In the Maldives there was not so much polite
applause, but out and out celebration. For the country had not been a benign
authoritarianism, but a thirty year exercise in kleptocracy, grand
lacerny and fear. The nation had endured the rule of President Abdul Gayoom,
indulged by those who should have known better essentially because he
was seen as a safe pair of hands.
Gayoom and his henchmen were essentially Ba'athists, part of the
same political movment that held sway across countries such as Iraq and
Syria. I used to remind senior British Government figures as they
prepared to bomb Ba'athist Iraq, that they were about to jet off on
holiday to the Ba'athist Maldives. Be that as it may, the Maldives is
not only the World's newest democracy—it is one of the World's most
fragile democracies. In recent weeks, the rule of the democratically
elected President Nasheed began to look a little shaky, as elements of
the old Gayoom regime coagulated under a grubby coalition of MPs and
corrupt judicial figures to try and force him out.
What had infuriated them more than anything else was the
seriousness behind the intent of the Maldives to recover huge stolen
assets—some $400 million, in fact, that now resides in foreign bank
accounts. This grand larceny does not include the wealth already
squandered on luxury yachts, palaces and all of the paraphernalia
associated with bog standard dictators. It was enough to alarm Gayoom,
and his close supporters and family, who it is alleged have paid off
enough Opposition MPs to make the Maldives more or less un-governable.
The latest crisis reached a kind of tipping point when President
Nasheed's Cabinet, rendered impotent both by Parliament and a judiciary
stuffed with appointees from the Gayoom era - and many without even
basic legal training, resigned on mass. Nasheed then re-appointed them,
but was accused of acting unconstitutionally when he put a leading
Opposition member under house arrest for a few days.
Meanwhile, the Maldives Opposition of assorted kleptocrats, dodgy
businessmen and friends of ex President Gayoom dispatched a former
Attorney General, Hassan Saeed, to London in a bid to dirty the name of
Nasheed, and hasten the ending of the Maldives' dalliance with
democracy. They hired a PR outfit, run by a group of ex British
Labourites, who know a thing or two about the dark arts which calls
itself the 'Campaign company', and set out to turn a few British
political heads, including it would seem Britain's former Deputy Prime
Minister, John Prescott. This was presumably on the basis that Prescott
had been on holiday in the Maldives. They also outsourced some of the
lobbying work to a London based Conservative, Peter Craske, whose job it
was to target top Tories - and detach that party from its close
relations with Nasheed's MDP party.
Unfortunately for them, this little escapade has received
widespread publicity here in the Maldives, particularly in the pages of
the ground-breaking internet newspaper, MINIVAN. Anyone doubting that
the Maldives is a successfully functioning democracy need look no
further than its pages. But still, there is the nagging worry that
because the Maldives is a small and faraway place, ignorance and
laziness can play their part. The democratic revolution that brought
Mohammed Nasheed to power is under threat—and not from an Opposition
that is motivated by different policies or principles, but by raw
economic self interest. Should the international community and media
turn a blind eye to the machinations of these and others, the Maldives
will drift back to dictatorship, possibly a dictatorship with a hardline
Islamic influence to boot.
Most Maldivians clearly don't want this. Nor should the rest of the World.