Warhol: Fake?

“Tate Modern's Nicholas Serota says he believes the deadpan self-portrait on a red background, made in 1965, is perfectly genuine. Nevertheless, he recently declined to have it bought with taxpayers' money, because of claims convulsing the art world that the picture may not actually be the work of one of the 20th century's most influential artists. Invective is being hurled back and forth across the Atlantic as a result. David Mearns, a Sussex businessman and underwater explorer, accuses the New York body that pronounces on Warhol authentications of "conspiring to remove" all the red portraits from the market.”

Read it at Guardian


Related Content

Is the Art Market More Corrupt Than Wall Street?

Is the Art Market More Corrupt Than Wall Street?

Chuck Close

Artist

blog comments powered by Disqus

Share This Story

About IdeaFeed

7299 Posts since 2009

Big ideas in the news from around the web

 

Feed us an idea!

Help us spread the best ideas of the web by suggesting a story to be included in the daily IdeaFeed.

Tags: Art Smart

Recent Posts